PART 0
PART 0
THE MANIFESTO

You're not anti-technology.
You're anti-nonsense.


There's a particular kind of exhaustion that sets in when every tool, app, product, and platform is suddenly "powered by AI." When your calendar app wants to summarize your own calendar back to you. When a customer service bot answers your question with five paragraphs and zero information. When someone at a meeting describes a problem that could be solved with a sticky note, then announces they're going to "build an AI workflow" around it.

You are not wrong to be tired of this. That exhaustion is calibrated.

This guide exists because the conversation around AI has collapsed into two camps: the true believers who see a revolution in every chatbot, and the dismissers who refuse to engage entirely. Both are missing something. The believers are ignoring real costs and real limitations. The dismissers are leaving genuinely useful tools on the table out of principle.

This is the guide for everyone in the middle — the people who just want to get work done, hate wasting time, and are open to using whatever actually works. Even if, occasionally, that thing is Claude.

WHAT WE ACTUALLY BELIEVE
  • A simpler tool is always better when it works. If a calculator, a search engine, a template, or a spreadsheet formula solves the problem — use that. Faster, cheaper, and you don't have to describe your situation to a robot.
  • AI has a real environmental cost. Not catastrophic, not a reason to never use it — but real. A single AI query uses roughly the energy of a small light bulb for a minute and a sip's worth of cooling water. Scale that to millions of queries and the numbers matter.
  • Dependency is a design choice. Tools that make you dependent on them to do basic tasks are not empowering you. The goal of every tool in this guide — including Claude — is to leave you more capable, not less.
  • Context is everything. AI is genuinely extraordinary at a specific category of tasks: synthesizing complex information, drafting long-form content, explaining things you don't understand, and working through problems with no obvious right answer. That category is smaller than the hype suggests — and larger than the skeptics admit.
  • You should stay in control. Using AI well means knowing when to use it, what to give it, and when to stop. It means checking the output. It means owning the result. The moment AI starts making decisions you should be making, it's time to zoom out.
WHAT THIS GUIDE IS NOT
  • —
    A pitch for AI adoption. We're not trying to convert you.
  • —
    An AI horror story. We're not trying to scare you either.
  • —
    A technical manual. No API keys, no jargon, no setup required.
  • —
    Sponsored by Anthropic. This guide will tell you, plainly, when Claude is the wrong tool.
  • —
    For developers. This is for people who work with documents, emails, decisions, and other humans.

By the end of this guide, you'll have a clear framework for when a low-tech tool beats AI every time, when AI genuinely earns its keep, and how to use Claude without becoming the person who asks it what to have for lunch.

The goal isn't to make you an AI user.
The goal is to make you a better judge of tools.

ONTOMATON · NEWBRAND.US
PART 1
PART 1

The Math of Overkill


AI isn't software. It's infrastructure. Every time you ask Claude something, a request travels to a data center, spins up compute, draws power, and generates heat that has to be cooled with actual water. This is not a moral argument — it's just physics. And physics has opinions about using a sledgehammer on a thumbtack.

SIDE-BY-SIDE COST COMPARISON
CALCULATOR APP
What's 15% of $47?
0.001WATT-HOURS
~0ML WATER
<1SECOND
ASKING CLAUDE
What's 15% of $47?
~3WATT-HOURS
~100ML WATER
3–8SECONDS
VS
GOOGLE SEARCH
What time does the post office close?
0.3WATT-HOURS
~3ML WATER
<2SECONDS
ASKING CLAUDE
What time does the post office close?
~3WATT-HOURS
~100ML WATER
5–12SECONDS
VS
EXCEL / GOOGLE SHEETS
Sort this list of 200 names alphabetically
0.005WATT-HOURS
~0ML WATER
<1SECOND
ASKING CLAUDE
Sort this list of 200 names alphabetically
~8WATT-HOURS
~250ML WATER
10–30SECONDS
THE OVERKILL RATIO
3,000x
MORE ENERGY than a calculator
1,600x
MORE ENERGY than a Google search
100ml
WATER per average AI query

None of this means AI is bad. It means AI is expensive — and expensive tools have a place. You wouldn't use a crane to move a chair. The question isn't whether to use AI. It's whether the job is actually crane-sized.

THE RIGHT TOOL FOR THE RIGHT JOB — THE ESCALATION LADDER
1
Simple calculation, unit conversion, timer
Phone calculator / clock app
0.001 Wh
2
Look up a fact, address, hours, price
Google search
0.3 Wh
3
Sort, filter, or calculate with data
Spreadsheet (Excel, Sheets, Numbers)
0.005 Wh
4
Repeat a task you do every week
Template, macro, or newbrand.us tool
0.001 Wh
5
Draft a long document, analyze a complex situation, research something with no clear answer
Now you can use Claude
3–50+ Wh
Energy and water figures are estimates based on published research into LLM inference costs (University of Massachusetts Amherst, 2023; Goldman Sachs Energy Report, 2024) and Google's published per-search energy figure. Actual costs vary by model size, query complexity, data center efficiency, and cooling method. The point is the order of magnitude, not the decimal place.
PART 2
PART 2

Your Phone Can Already Do That


Before we get to AI, let's establish something: the device in your pocket is extraordinary. It has a calculator, a search engine, a camera scanner, a unit converter, a timer, a weather station, a notes app, a spreadsheet, and about forty other tools that work instantly, offline, and without consuming a data center's worth of electricity. Most of what people use AI for, they didn't need AI for.

CALCULATIONS & CONVERSIONS
Never needs AI
What's 18% tip on $63.40?
Calculator app
63.40 x 1.18. Done in four taps.
How many miles is 14 kilometers?
Google / Siri / Spotlight search
Type "14 km in miles" into any search bar.
What's today's exchange rate?
Google search
Also: XE.com. Real-time, authoritative.
How many days until my deadline?
Calendar app / timeanddate.com
Your calendar already has this. Open it.
INFORMATION LOOKUPS
Google is faster
What are the store hours?
Google search
Hours appear in the knowledge panel instantly. AI has to look this up anyway — and may get it wrong.
What's the weather this weekend?
Weather app
Built into every phone. Uses live data. Claude cannot do this without a web tool enabled.
What does this word mean?
Dictionary app / Google
Type the word. Get the definition. AI adds a paragraph of context you didn't ask for.
Track my package
Carrier app / Gmail auto-track
Claude cannot track packages. Gmail can. So can every shipping app ever made.
SPREADSHEET TASKS
Excel was built for this
FORMULAS THAT REPLACE AI FOR 80% OF OFFICE MATH
Sum a column
=SUM(A1:A100)
Average without outliers
=AVERAGEIF(A1:A100,"<1000")
Count how many times X appears
=COUNTIF(B1:B50,"Yes")
Find a value in another table
=VLOOKUP(D2,Sheet2!A:B,2,0)
Combine first and last name
=A2&" "&B2
Flag overdue dates
=IF(C2<TODAY(),"OVERDUE","OK")
Don't know a formula? Type your question into the formula bar in Google Sheets — it has built-in AI assistance that runs locally and doesn't require a separate tool.
THE HONEST COMPARISON — GOOGLE VS. CLAUDE
USE GOOGLE WHEN YOU NEED
A specific fact with a known answer
Current information (prices, hours, news)
A direct link to a source
Images, maps, or local results
Something you can verify in one click
USE CLAUDE WHEN YOU NEED
To understand something, not just find it
To draft, rewrite, or structure text
To think through a decision or problem
To synthesize many sources into one answer
When the answer requires judgment, not lookup
FREE TOOLS AT NEWBRAND.US THAT REPLACE AI FOR SPECIFIC JOBS
Invoice Generator
Create and send professional invoices in under two minutes. No account required.
newbrand.us/invoice
QR Code Maker
Generate a QR code for any URL, text, or contact. Download instantly.
newbrand.us/qr
Email Signature Builder
Drag-and-drop your details. Copy the HTML. Paste into Gmail or Outlook.
newbrand.us/signature
Privacy Policy Generator
Answer ten questions. Get a compliant privacy policy for your site or app.
newbrand.us/privacy
Business Name Checker
Search name availability across LLC registrations and domain names simultaneously.
newbrand.us/names
PDF Merge & Split
Combine or split PDFs in your browser. Nothing leaves your device.
newbrand.us/pdf

You've now got the full low-tech arsenal. So when does the ladder actually require climbing?

PART 3
PART 3

The Escalation Ladder


Every task sits somewhere on a spectrum. At one end: things with a single correct answer, retrievable in seconds, requiring no interpretation. At the other end: things with no correct answer, requiring synthesis, judgment, and language. AI earns its cost at the second end of that spectrum. The ladder tells you where your task actually sits.

THE RIGHT TOOL, RIGHT JOB FRAMEWORK
Calculator2+2Googleknown factsSpreadsheetstructured dataTemplaterepeatable tasksClaudecomplex, openjudgment requiredONE RIGHT ANSWERJUDGMENT REQUIRED
STAY LOW-TECH WHEN
The answer exists somewhere and you just need to find it
The task is the same every time you do it
A formula or filter can do the work
Speed matters more than nuance
The source needs to be citable
You need real-time data (prices, weather, hours)
ESCALATE TO CLAUDE WHEN
There's no single right answer — only better or worse ones
The task would take you 30+ minutes to do manually
You need to produce language, not just retrieve it
You're synthesizing information from multiple sources
You want a first draft, not a final answer
The task requires understanding context, not just matching keywords

Real tasks, real verdicts

Every example below represents something a real person actually tried to use AI for. Some are obvious mismatches. Others are genuinely good uses. The verdict is based on the framework above.

LOW
"What's the capital of Australia?"
USE GOOGLE
Google search → 0.3 Wh
Single correct answer. Available instantly. AI adds latency and cost for zero additional value.
LOW
"Set a timer for 25 minutes"
USE SIRI / ALEXA
Voice assistant → ~0.001 Wh
This is what voice assistants were built for. Asking Claude to set a timer is like using a forklift to open a door.
LOW
"Sort this list of 50 client names alphabetically"
USE SPREADSHEET
Excel / Sheets: Data → Sort → ~0.005 Wh
Spreadsheets process structured data in milliseconds. AI will sort it correctly — after you paste it, wait for it, and copy it back out.
AI
"Help me write a difficult email declining a longtime client"
USE CLAUDE
Claude → worth every watt
No formula does this. Tone, relationship history, desired outcome — this requires language, judgment, and craft.
AI
"I have three job offers. Help me think through which one to take."
USE CLAUDE
Claude → genuinely useful
Complex tradeoffs, personal values, long-term implications. This is exactly the kind of open-ended synthesis AI handles well.
AI
"Summarize this 40-page report into five key findings"
USE CLAUDE
Claude → hours saved, legitimately
Reading compression at scale is one of AI's clearest wins. Two minutes instead of ninety, with reasonable accuracy.
THE TIPPING POINT TEST — FIVE QUESTIONS
1
Is there a single, verifiable correct answer to this?
If yes → Google it
2
Could a formula, filter, or sort function handle this?
If yes → use your spreadsheet
3
Have you done this exact task before?
If yes → build a template
4
Does the answer require judgment, synthesis, or language?
If yes → Claude earns it
5
Would doing this manually take more than 30 minutes?
If yes → Claude earns it
Two or more "earns it" answers = justified. One or zero = reach for the low-tech tool first. You can always escalate if it's not enough.

You now know when to climb the ladder. Next: what to actually say when you get there.

PART 4
PART 4

Claude for the Skeptic


You've made it to the AI section. The fact that you're still here means one of two things: you're genuinely open to being persuaded, or you want to know what you're arguing against. Either is fine. This section will not oversell. It will show you exactly how to use Claude — on your terms — and be equally honest about where it falls flat.

HOW TO PROMPT LIKE A SKEPTIC

Most people get mediocre results from AI because they ask vague questions and expect magic. Skeptics are actually better positioned here — you already don't trust it, which means you'll be specific, critical, and in control. That's exactly the right posture.

1
Be specific. Vague in, vague out.
Claude cannot read your mind. The more context you give — your role, your audience, your constraints, your goal — the better the output. Treat it like briefing a contractor, not wishing on a star.
WEAK
"Write me an email."
STRONG
"Write a two-paragraph email to a client who missed a payment deadline. Tone: firm but not hostile. We want to preserve the relationship. Include a specific deadline of Friday."
2
Tell it what you don't want.
Negative constraints are just as useful as positive ones. If you don't want bullet points, say so. If you don't want it to be overly formal, say so. Claude defaults to safe, generic, helpful — you can override every part of that.
WEAK
"Summarize this article."
STRONG
"Summarize this article in three sentences. No bullet points. Write it the way a smart colleague would explain it at lunch, not like a press release."
3
Ask for a draft, not a final answer.
The healthiest way to use Claude is as a first-pass generator, not a final authority. Ask for a draft. Read it critically. Edit it. The goal is to get 70% of the way there in two minutes, then spend your effort on the last 30%.
WEAK
"Write my resignation letter."
STRONG
"Give me a first draft of a resignation letter. I'll edit it heavily — just get me started. Two weeks notice, leaving on good terms, no need to explain why."
4
Push back when it's wrong.
Claude is not right by default. It will occasionally confabulate facts, misread your tone, or produce something generic. Tell it. "That's too formal." "You missed the point." "Start over with a different angle." It responds well to direct criticism.
WEAK
Accept the first output. Paste it into your email. Regret it later.
STRONG
"This is too stiff. Rewrite it — warmer, shorter, and cut the third paragraph entirely."
5
Always verify facts independently.
Claude's knowledge has a cutoff date. It can be confidently wrong about current events, specific statistics, and niche technical details. If the output contains a fact you're going to act on, check it. This is not a knock on AI — it's just how it works.
WEAK
"What's the current interest rate?" → use Claude's answer in a proposal.
STRONG
Use Claude for structure and language. Use Google or official sources for current facts, statistics, and legal specifics.

TEN TASKS CLAUDE IS GENUINELY GOOD AT

Not hype. Not demos. Real tasks that real people do every week, where AI saves meaningful time.

01
Drafting difficult emails and messages
"Write a message to my landlord about a repair that's been ignored for three weeks. Firm but professional. I want action, not conflict."
Tone calibration is hard. Claude is good at it. You edit the final version — it gets you unstuck.
02
Summarizing long documents
"Here's a 30-page lease agreement. Summarize the key obligations on my end, any unusual clauses, and anything I should push back on."
Reading compression at scale. Not a replacement for a lawyer — but a useful first pass.
03
Explaining complex topics simply
"Explain how a Roth IRA works to someone who has never invested before. No jargon. Use an analogy."
Patient, infinitely, without making you feel dumb. Better than most explainers online.
04
Preparing for a difficult conversation
"I need to give a performance review to an employee who's been underperforming but is well-liked. Help me think through what to say."
Helps you rehearse, anticipate objections, and find the right framing before you're in the room.
05
Editing and rewriting your own drafts
"Here's a proposal I wrote. Make it tighter — cut anything redundant, fix the structure, and make the opening stronger."
Editing your own writing is hard. An outside perspective, even an artificial one, helps.
06
Building a framework for a decision
"I'm trying to decide whether to hire a contractor or bring on a part-time employee. What questions should I be asking and what are the tradeoffs?"
Claude won't make the decision for you. But it will surface considerations you hadn't thought of.
07
Generating options when you're stuck
"I need ten ideas for a team offsite that aren't trust falls or trivia nights. Budget around $500. Team of eight."
Brainstorming with Claude is fast and low-stakes. You'll use two of the ten ideas. That's fine.
08
Translating technical content
"Here's a quote from a contractor for electrical work. Explain what each line item means in plain English."
Bridging the gap between specialist language and plain understanding. Consistently useful.
09
Writing job descriptions and interview questions
"Write a job description for a part-time bookkeeper at a small creative agency. Include five interview questions that reveal whether they're detail-oriented."
Structured writing tasks with clear parameters. Claude handles the blank page problem well.
10
Creating a first draft of anything long
"Draft an outline and introduction for a business proposal for a catering company pitching a corporate client. Formal tone, emphasis on reliability."
The hardest part of writing is starting. Claude removes that friction. The rest is yours to own.

WHERE CLAUDE ACTUALLY FALLS SHORT
UNRELIABLE
Current facts, prices, and live data
Knowledge cutoff means Claude can be wrong about anything that's changed recently. Never use it as your only source for statistics, current events, or anything time-sensitive.
UNRELIABLE
Specific legal, medical, and financial advice
Claude will always tell you to consult a professional — and it's right. It can help you understand concepts and prepare questions for your advisor. It cannot replace the advisor.
WEAK
Highly technical or niche domains
Claude knows a lot about a lot. But in specialized fields — advanced engineering, novel research, obscure legal jurisdictions — it will sometimes fill gaps with plausible-sounding nonsense. Experts should verify everything.
WEAK
Tasks requiring your personal voice
Claude can approximate your tone if you describe it well. But it will never sound exactly like you. For content that needs your genuine voice — personal essays, social media, your own brand — treat Claude as a starting point, not a ghost writer.
CANNOT DO
Anything requiring real-time internet access by default
Without web search enabled, Claude cannot check live prices, current news, or anything that happened recently. It's not connected to the internet the way Google is.
CANNOT DO
Make decisions for you
This sounds obvious, but it's worth saying: Claude can help you think. It cannot — and should not — replace your judgment. Every output is a draft. Every recommendation is an input. You are still the one deciding.
THE SKEPTIC'S RULES OF ENGAGEMENT
ALWAYS DO THIS
→
Read the output before you use it
→
Edit it to sound like you
→
Verify any facts that matter
→
Push back if it's wrong or generic
→
Own the final result
NEVER DO THIS
—
Paste AI output without reading it
—
Use it for tasks a simpler tool handles
—
Treat the first draft as the final answer
—
Let it make decisions you should make
—
Stop thinking critically because it sounds confident

You've got the mindset and the mechanics. Now let's put it to work — with the actual tools you use every day.

PART 5
PART 5

The Office Anti-Suite


Microsoft Office didn't fail you. Google Workspace didn't fail you. You just never got a clear map of which tool handles which job — and where, at the exact right moment, it makes sense to hand off to AI. This section is that map. Start with the simplest tool that works. Escalate only when it doesn't.

COMMON OFFICE WORKFLOWS — WITH ESCALATION POINTS MARKED

Each workflow below shows the full task from start to finish. Steps with a coral marker are the escalation points — the moments where AI genuinely saves time. Everything else stays low-tech.

Sending a proposal to a new client
From blank page to sent document
WEEKLY TASK
1
Draft the proposal structure and opening paragraph
Claude — "Draft a proposal outline for [service] to [type of client]. Formal tone, one page."
~3 Wh
2
Fill in your specific pricing, timeline, and deliverables
Your own knowledge — no AI needed here
0 Wh
3
Format into a clean document
Google Docs or Word — use your saved template
~0.005 Wh
4
Review and tighten the language before sending
Claude — "Edit this for concision. Cut anything that sounds like filler."
~2 Wh
5
Export as PDF and send via email
Your email client — Gmail, Outlook, Apple Mail
~0.01 Wh
WITHOUT AI
90
MINUTES AVERAGE
Staring at a blank page, writing and rewriting the opening, second-guessing the tone.
WITH THIS WORKFLOW
25
MINUTES AVERAGE
AI handles the blank page and the final polish. You handle the substance. That split is the whole point.
Monthly expense reporting
From receipts to submitted report
MONTHLY TASK
1
Collect and photograph receipts throughout the month
Phone camera — file into a folder as you go
0 Wh
2
Enter amounts into your expense spreadsheet
Google Sheets — use =SUM() and category filters
~0.005 Wh
3
Write the narrative summary for your manager or accountant
Claude — "Here are my expense totals by category. Write a two-paragraph summary for my manager explaining the main categories and any unusual items."
~2 Wh
4
Generate and send the invoice if billing to client
newbrand.us/invoice — free, no account required
~0.001 Wh
Hiring a contractor or part-time employee
From need identified to first interview
OCCASIONAL TASK
1
Write the job description
Claude — "Write a job description for a part-time [role] at a small [type] business. Include responsibilities, requirements, and compensation range of [X]."
~3 Wh
2
Post to job boards and review applications
Indeed, LinkedIn, Craigslist — your call based on role
~0.3 Wh
3
Prepare interview questions
Claude — "Give me eight interview questions for this role that reveal attention to detail, reliability, and how they handle ambiguity."
~2 Wh
4
Conduct interviews and check references
In person or video call — this part stays human
0 Wh
5
Draft the offer letter or contractor agreement
Claude — "Draft a simple offer letter for a part-time contractor. Rate: $X/hr, start date: [X], scope: [X]. Have a lawyer review before sending."
~3 Wh
Handling a difficult customer complaint
From angry email to resolved situation
UNPREDICTABLE TASK
1
Read the complaint carefully. Understand what they actually want.
Your judgment — no tool replaces this step
0 Wh
2
Draft a response that acknowledges, doesn't over-apologize, and proposes a resolution
Claude — "A customer is angry about [X]. We can offer [Y]. Write a response that's empathetic but not groveling, and moves toward resolution."
~3 Wh
3
Edit the draft so it sounds like you, not a template
Your voice — this edit takes two minutes and matters
0 Wh
4
Send and follow up if needed
Your email client
~0.01 Wh
WHEN YOUR LOW-TECH TOOL HITS ITS LIMIT — ESCALATION MAP
WHAT YOU STARTED WITH
WHEN TO ESCALATE TO CLAUDE
Word / Google Docs draft
→
When you've rewritten the opening three times and still hate it
Spreadsheet with data
→
When you need to explain what the numbers mean in plain English
Email thread you need to reply to
→
When the situation is delicate and tone really matters
List of ideas you've brainstormed
→
When you're stuck and need ten more options fast
Template you've used before
→
When this particular situation is different enough that the template doesn't fit
Google search results
→
When you have the facts but need help understanding what they mean for your situation

The workflows are in place. Now let's talk about what you're actually sharing when you use any of this — and how to stay in control of it.

PART 6
PART 6

AI Hygiene for Normal People


If you've made it this far, you're using Claude more thoughtfully than 90% of people who use it. But there's one more thing worth understanding: what actually happens to what you type. Not because it's a scandal — but because knowing it lets you make smarter choices about what to share and what to keep offline.

WHAT YOU'RE SHARING WHEN YOU USE CLAUDE

Everything you type into Claude is processed by Anthropic's servers. That's how it works — the model runs in the cloud, not on your device. Here's how to think about what's appropriate to share.

GENERALLY FINE TO SHARE
  • General business descriptions
  • Anonymized situations and scenarios
  • Document drafts without personal info
  • Industry questions and research
  • Creative writing and brainstorming
  • Public information you're trying to understand
SHARE WITH CARE
  • Client names and details — anonymize where possible
  • Internal financial figures
  • Employee performance details
  • Sensitive business strategy
  • Legal matters under active dispute
  • Anything under NDA
KEEP THIS OFFLINE
  • Passwords or login credentials
  • Social security numbers
  • Full credit card or bank details
  • Medical records with identifying info
  • Classified or regulated information
  • Other people's private communications
FIVE MYTHS ABOUT AI PRIVACY — CORRECTED
MYTH
"Claude remembers everything I've ever told it."
By default, Claude does not retain memory between separate conversations. Each new conversation starts fresh. There is a memory feature you can enable — but it's opt-in, and you can view and delete what it stores at any time in your settings.
MYTH
"Anthropic is reading my conversations to sell me things."
Anthropic does not sell user data or run an advertising business. Conversations may be reviewed by staff for safety and model improvement purposes — which you can opt out of in your account settings under data privacy.
MYTH
"If I use Claude for work stuff, my company's data is exposed."
Using the consumer product (claude.ai) for sensitive business data is worth thinking about carefully. Claude for Teams and Enterprise have stronger data handling commitments — conversations are not used for training and data stays within your organization's agreement.
MYTH
"AI is always listening, like a smart speaker."
Claude is not ambient. It only processes what you actively type and submit. Nothing is captured passively. It has no access to your microphone, camera, files, or anything outside the conversation window unless you explicitly upload or paste it.
MYTH
"Deleting a conversation means it's gone forever."
Deleting a conversation removes it from your visible history. Anthropic may retain logs for a period of time for safety and legal compliance purposes, as outlined in their privacy policy. For truly sensitive material, the safest approach is not to share it at all.

SETTINGS WORTH KNOWING ABOUT
Conversation history
claude.ai → Settings → Data & Privacy
You can delete individual conversations or your entire history. Useful if you've shared something sensitive and want to clear the record.
Recommended: review monthly
Training data opt-out
claude.ai → Settings → Data & Privacy
You can request that your conversations not be used to train future models. This is available on paid plans and through the privacy request form.
Recommended: enable if using for business
Memory settings
claude.ai → Settings → Memory
If memory is enabled, Claude builds a profile of what you've told it across conversations. You can view, edit, or delete any stored memory at any time.
Recommended: review what's stored quarterly
Account deletion
claude.ai → Settings → Account
Full account deletion removes your profile and associated conversation history. Anthropic will confirm the deletion timeline in their response.
Nuclear option — available if you need it
THE AI HYGIENE CHECKLIST
BEFORE YOU TYPE
Would I be uncomfortable if a colleague read this conversation?
Does this contain real names, account numbers, or sensitive identifiers I can anonymize?
Is this covered by an NDA or confidentiality agreement?
BEFORE YOU USE THE OUTPUT
Have I read the full response before pasting it anywhere?
Have I verified any facts, statistics, or dates it mentioned?
Does this actually sound like me, or like a chatbot?
Am I comfortable owning this output as my own work?
PERIODICALLY
Clear old conversations that contain sensitive details
Review your memory settings if enabled
Ask yourself: am I using AI because it helps, or out of habit?

None of this is meant to frighten you. Anthropic is a safety-focused company with a published privacy policy and genuine commitments to responsible AI. The hygiene practices above are just good data practices for any cloud service — the same common sense you'd apply to Google Drive, Dropbox, or email. The goal is informed use, not paranoia.


That's the full guide. All that's left is the one page you'll actually keep.

APPENDIX
APPENDIX

The Quick Reference Card

Everything in this guide, on one page. Keep it. Share it. Argue with it.


ALWAYS USE A SIMPLE TOOL FOR
  • —Calculations and unit conversions
  • —Current facts, prices, and hours
  • —Weather, timers, reminders
  • —Sorting and filtering structured data
  • —Generating invoices and QR codes
  • —Anything with a single correct answer
  • —Tasks you do the same way every time
ESCALATE TO CLAUDE WHEN
  • →There is no single correct answer
  • →You need to produce or improve language
  • →The task would take 30+ minutes manually
  • →You need to synthesize multiple inputs
  • →Tone and judgment matter
  • →You're stuck and need a first draft
  • →You need 10 options fast
THE FIVE-QUESTION TIPPING POINT TEST
STAY LOW-TECH
1
Is there a verifiable correct answer? → Google it
2
Can a formula or filter handle it? → Use your spreadsheet
3
Have you done this exact task before? → Use a template
CLAUDE EARNS IT
4
Does it require judgment, synthesis, or language?
5
Would doing it manually take 30+ minutes?
—
Two "earns it" answers = justified escalation
PROMPTING IN SIX MOVES
Be specificInclude your role, audience, tone, and constraints
Say what you don't wantNo bullet points, no formal tone, cut the fluff
Ask for a draftNot a final answer — a starting point you'll edit
Push back"Too stiff." "Missed the point." "Try again."
Verify factsAny statistic or date you'll act on — check it
Own the outputEdit it to sound like you before using it
TEN TASKS CLAUDE IS GENUINELY GOOD AT
  • 01Drafting difficult emails
  • 02Summarizing long documents
  • 03Explaining complex topics simply
  • 04Preparing for hard conversations
  • 05Editing and tightening your drafts
  • 06Building decision frameworks
  • 07Generating options when stuck
  • 08Translating technical language
  • 09Writing job descriptions and questions
  • 10Creating first drafts of anything long
WHERE CLAUDE FALLS SHORT
  • —Current facts, prices, live data
  • —Specific legal or medical advice
  • —Highly specialized technical domains
  • —Your genuine personal voice
  • —Real-time internet access by default
  • —Making decisions for you
  • NEVER SHARE WITH ANY AI
  • —Passwords or credentials
  • —SSNs, banking details, medical records
  • —Anything under NDA
The goal was never to make you an AI user. It was to make you a better judge of tools. You've got the map. Use it on your terms.
ONTOMATON · NEWBRAND.US

Claude for Haters — The Anti-AI User's Guide to Claude · First Edition
newbrand.us

You finished the book.
Now you know when to use a calculator, when to use a spreadsheet, and when Claude actually earns its keep. Share it with someone who needs the framework.
← Back to newbrand.us